Er hitinn að verða óbærilegur í hellinum

Anskotans aulagangur hjá BNA að vera ekki búnir að ná honum.

Bin Laden hefur áhyggjur af hlýnun jarðar

Athugasemdir

[Trausti (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 12:27]

Það er engin Bin Laden til!! Meira kjaftæðið..  Þetta er ekkert annað en áróðursmaskína kanans...

 Ef Tablibanar drepa bandarískan hermann í þeirra eigin landi þá er það hryðjuverk..

Ef Bandaríkin sprengir heilt þorp af saklausum borgurum í Afganistan þá er það mistök!!

Þið sem virkilega haldið að Bandaríkin séu í Afganistan af einhverri hugsjón!! Take a second look!

Ef þið haldið virkilega að innrás Bandaríkjana í Írak sé að gera heiminn öruggari! Take a second look!

Ef þið virkilega haldið að Al-Qaeda hafi staðið að árás á tvíburaturnana! Take a second look!

Fólk verður að fara að taka hausinn úr rassgatinu á sér og hætta að trúa öllu því sem okkur er fóðrað frá fjölmiðlum..

[tb (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 12:51]

Er ekki bara líklegast að USA sé að reyna að samnýta tækifærin... leysa afghanistan við talíbana og fá svo olíu í leiðinni.

Það er allavega pottþétt að ef lítil fyrirtæki geta markaðssett sig á einhvern hátt og sýnt góður hliðar, falið slæmar... þá geta Bandaríkin pottþétt gert það sama... og gert það enn betur.

Það er alveg pottþétt að  myndin sem við höfum af Bandaríkjastjórn er ekki 100% rétt, en það er reyndar líka pottþétt að myndin sem við höfum af hinum hliðunum er ekki heldur 100% pottþétt.

Það sama á við um aðrar deilur, t.d. deilurnar milli Ísrael og Palestínu.  Þar sem Palestínu hefur tekist mjög vel í markaðssetningunni, allavega hér á landi.  Svo hefur Ísrael tekist betur upp t.d. í Bandaríkjunum.

...

Það þýðir víst ekki bara að taka við fréttatilkynningunum frá þessum löndum og treysta því að þær segi allan sannleikann.

[Sigurður Sigurðsson, 1.10.2010 kl. 12:52]

Vá strax komnar samsæriskenningar.

[Garðar Valur Hallfreðsson, 1.10.2010 kl. 13:08]

Trausti,án þess að vera að taka upp hanskann fyrir BNA eða Bin Laden, en við sem trúum öllu sem er fóðrað í okkur í fjölmiðlum, hverjum þeirra eigum við að trúa?  Ef við eigum ekki að fá upplýsingar okkar frá fjölmiðlum, hvaðan eigum við að fá þær?  Spyr sá sem "greinilega" ekki veit.

[palli (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 13:19]

Þetta er eldgömmul frétt.

Getið hlustað á ræðuna hans Osama hérna.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI4DGTfkxI0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7fF772ntzQ&feature=related

[Jökull (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 14:22]

Helduru virkilega að USA væru ekki búnir að finna Bin Laden ef þeir vildu það?

Helduru virkilega að maður sem býr í helli hafi skipulagt 9/11?

Veistu hvað USA eru að græða mikið á stríðinu í Írak og Afganistan?

[Trausti (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 14:44]

Sigurður!!

 Hefur þú einhverntímann hugsað út í þá staðreynd að þú trúir sjálfur á samsæriskenningu!!

 Sú samsæriskenning kemur frá ríkisstjórn Bush!!

 Og þú efaðist aldrei!!

[palli (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 15:44]

Bush flaug flugvélinni sjálfur á turnana. Ef þið horfið á vidjó af 9/11 í slow mótion getið þið séð hann hoppa út í fallhlíf.

[Garðar Valur Hallfreðsson, 1.10.2010 kl. 16:57]

Ég tek undir með Palla

[Jökull (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 17:26]

Right.

Hinsvegar ef þið horfið á turnana falla þá er nóg að vera með smá grunn í eðlisfræði til að sjá að svona gerist ekki vegna flugvélar. Þetta kallast controlled demolition á ensku.

[Sveinn Þór Hrafnsson, 1.10.2010 kl. 22:12]

Garðar Valur og Siggi Sig

Hér er að finna góða grein hvernig maður á að standa sig í að læra tilveruna upp á nýtt. gagnauga.is

Þú tekur ekki við samsæriskenningum afþví einhver sagði. Þú þarft að gera þína eigin rannsókn. Ég sjálfur byrjaði vikuna sem bankarnir hrundu. Og raunverulega var í allavega tvo ef ekki þrá mánuði að rannsaka og læra.

Nú skil ég mun betur allt þetta bull sem er dælt yfir okkur af erlendu fjölmiðlunum, Eða skil betur hvað liggur að baki.

Svona nú ekki gera bara grín af samsæriskenningum, heiminum hefur verið stjórnað að valda miklu fólki í þúsundar ára af hverju haldi þið að þetta fólk sé hætt að stjórna? Bara farið í frí?   Nei svo er ekki..

[el-Toro, 1.10.2010 kl. 23:31]

mjög góð athugasemd hjá Sveini Þór.  gagnauga.is er mjög þarfleg síða fyrir þá sem vilja hugsa sjálfstætt og út fyrir ramma okkar blessuðu fjölmiðla-elítu.  sem er í raun ekkert annað copy/paste frá evrópu og bandaríkjunum.

ein af stærstu ástæðum þess að bandaríkin eru í afganistan er sú að auðlyndir evróasíu eru þær langstærstu sem enn eru ónýttar í heiminum.  fyrir þá sem þekkja aðferðir bandaríkjanna í að sækjast eftir auðlyndum annarra kemur þetta ekkert á óvart.  en fyrir þá sem ekki vita, þá eru bandaríkin í krafti "superpower" síns að seilast í þessar auðlyndir áður en löndin þarna komast á það stig að geta nýtt sínar auðlyndir sjálf.  til þess að bandaríkin geti gert allt þetta án þess að verða fyrir aðkasti landanna sem hugsanlega vilja virkja auðlyndir sínar sjálf en hafa einfaldlega ekki efni á því, þá þurfa bandaríkin að halda uppi ótta þessara ríkja sem og ótta í hinum vestræna heimi.  allir þurfa að óttast þann óvin sem áður hét sovétríkin (hét bandaríkin í ríkjum sovétríkjanna).  óttast hann svo mikið að bandaríkin geti haldið úti herliði og stundað sinn hernað með fjölmiðlana gargandi "danger danger" og hræða allan heimin um hinn illa osama bin laden og al-qaeda eða talibana.  birta stanslausar fréttir um yfirvofandi árásir hryðjuverkamanna á vesturlöndum.  allt til þess eins að fá okkur til að samþykkja hættuna svo bandaríkin geti haldið úti herliði í þessum löndum.  bandarískar herstöðvar eru í mörgum af þessum löndum sem tilheira evróasíu.

það sem stendur hér að ofan eru staðreindir sem hægt er að lesa sér til um á netinu.  það er ekki eitt ríki á þessu svæði sem bandaríkin, eu eða kína er ekki með fjárfestingar í gangi.

alveg eins var Vietnam stríðið háð af bandaríkjunum til að sína þjóðunum í kring hvað biði þeirra ef þau svo mikið sem leifðu sér að dreyma um að slíta sig frá áhrifum bandaríkjanna og kapitalismans.  í þeim skilningi er hægt að segja að bandaríkin hafi unnið víetnam stríðið, þó svo hin skoðunin um að þeir hafi í raun tapað stríðinu séu góð og gild líka.  engar uppreisnir litu þó dagsins ljós þarna næstu áratugina á eftir fyrir utan rauðu khmerana í kambodíu.  og viti menn, bandaríkin studdu þá í byrjun.

svo er gott að hafa í huga þau atriði sem knúa bandaríkin áfram.  wall street, ríkir gyðingar, vopnaframleiðendur, risa-fyrirtækin og olíufurstarnir.  bandaríkin snúast í kringum þessa þrýstihópa.  engin getur orðið forseti bandaríkjanna nema halda þessum þrýstihópum rólegum.

svo að lokum fyrir þá sem vilja byrja að lesa sér til um hlutina.  þá eru oft góðar greinar um hin og þessi mál á wikipedia.org  það að lesa sér til um á wikipedia er góð byrjun.  wikipedia skoraði um 92% í sannleykagildi þess efnis sem hún inniheldur fyrir nokkrum árum.  á sama tíma skoraði brittanica sem er ritstýrður vefur 94% í samskonar könnun. 

 góðar stundir

[magus (IP-tala skráð) 1.10.2010 kl. 23:45]

Sigurður! Osama hefur sennilega verið dauður síðan Desember 2001...

Allar þessar upptökur sem hafa birst með karlinum síðustu ár hafa verið falsanir samkvæmt helstu sérfræðingum...þar á meðal myndbandið þar sem hann á að hafa játað á sig 11. sept...Þessar fölsuðu upptökur hafa allar komið frá einum og sama aðilanum....það er sama aðila og þessi frétt mbl vísar á sem heimild... 

http://kryppa.com/israel-plis-ekki-fleiri-bin-laden-teip/  

og svo

Kevin Barrett

As a PhD in Islamic and Arabic Studies, I hate to say this, but I’ll say it anyway. The events of 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam. The war on terror itself is as phony as the latest “Bin Laden tape.” (Guardian 04)

It’s tough to admit because I know on which side my bread is buttered - and dropping Islam from the 9/11 equation is like dropping my bread butter-side-down. The myth that 9/11 had something to do with has poured millions into Arabic and Islamic studies. I finished my PhD in 2005, so all I have to do is keep my eyes in my pocket and my nose to the ground, parrot the party line, and I’ll be on the fast track to tenure.

The trouble is, it’s all based on a big lie. Take the recent “Bin Laden tape,” - please! That voice was no more Bin Laden than it was my late Aunt Corinne from Peoria. I recently helped translate a previously unknown Bin Laden tape, a real one from the early 90’s, back when he was still alive. I know the guy’s flowery religious rhetoric. The recent tape certainly wasn’t him.

The top American Bin Laden expert agrees. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies Department, has just finished a book of translations of Bin Laden’s speeches. He says the recent tape is a fake and that Bin Laden has been dead for years. (ABC 2004).

Ersatz Bin Laden tapes “verified” by the CIA are nothing new. Every Bin Laden statement since 2001 has been blatantly bogus. The last we heard from the real Bin Laden were the following words recorded by Pakistani journalists: “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation . . . I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks on the United States . . . I had no knowledge of these attacks. . .” (Wiki 2004)

Then, on December 13, 2001, as George Bush was whining about the “outrageous conspiracy theories” that were spreading like wildfire, the first and shoddiest of the “Bin Laden Speaks from the Grave” tapes appeared. The video’s sound and picture quality were horrible. It showed a big guy with a black beard, doing a passable imitation of Bin Laden’s voice, claiming foreknowledge, if not responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and chortling over their success. The trouble was, the big guy was clearly not Bin Laden. He was at least 40 or 50 pounds heavier and his facial features were obviously different. (911Res 2005)

The “Fatty Bin Laden tape” was widely ridiculed and I have yet to meet an informed observer who considers it authentic. (If you haven’t figured this out yet, go back and look at the images from the tape and compare them to other images of Bin Laden.) But the media let the fraud pass without asking the hard questions. Why was the US government waving this blatantly fake “confession” video in our faces?

Perhaps due to the widespread hilarity evoked by Fatty Bin Laden, the next Ousama-from-beyond-the-grave message had no images: It was an audio tape delivered to al-Jazeera in the fall of 2002. The CIA verified it as “authentic,” but ended up with egg on its face when the world’s leading voice identification experts at IDIAP in Switzerland reported that “the message was recorded by an impostor.” (Guardian 2002)

Every Bin Laden message since then has been equally phony. They are released at moments when the Bush regime needs a boost - and the American (mainstream) media go along with the fraud. Remember the bogus Bin Laden tape that made headlines right before the 2004 elections? If you didn’t figure out that it was a CIA-produced commercial for George Bush, I have some great bridges to sell you. Walter Cronkite, bless his heart, opined that Karl Rove was behind that tape. (CNN ) But the rest of the media just kept pretending that the Emperor was clothed.

And the fraud continues. Last week’s [need a date if you don’t want this article to age prematurely] Bin Laden tape has been ridiculed by America’s top Bin Laden expert, yet the US media gamely held its tattered fig leaf over the Emperor’s loins. Professor Lawrence believes that the tape was designed to distract world opinion from the horrific massacre of Pakistani civilians by an errant CIA drone. But it may have another, more sinister purpose: To prepare public opinion for another false-flag 9/11-style attack designed to trigger a US-Israel nuclear attack on Iran. (AC 2005)

As our top Bin Laden expert Professor Lawrence says, the real Bin Laden, who insisted that he had nothing to do with 9/11, has been dead since 2001. The fake messages have been fabricated by al-CIA-duh to support the Bush regime and its phony “war on terror.” It is time for Americans to rise up against the masters of synthetic terror who have been looting the US taxpayer, torching the Constitution, demolishing the economy, and threatening a nuclear Armageddon.

About the author

Dr Barrett holds a PhD in Arabic, with a focus on Islamic studies, from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. He is cofounder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com

References

(Guardian 04) The Making of the Terror Myth. The Guardian, Oct 10 2004.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html

(ABC 04) A. Rupinta. Duke Professor Sceptical of Bin Laden Tape. ABC News, Jan. 19, 2006.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?%20section=local=3828678

(Wiki 2004) Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 Attacks. Wikipedia, 2004.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11,_2001_attacks

(911Res 2005) “Fatty” bin Laden. 911 Research. 2005.

http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html

(Guardian 2002) B. Whittaker. Swiss Scientists 95% Sure that Bin Laden Recording Was a Fake. The Guardian, Jan 30, 2002.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,851112,00.html

(CNN 2004) Larry King Live. Bin Laden Releases New Videotape. CNN. Oct 24, 2004.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html

Referred to in WRH. [hot link “WRH” to following URL:]

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cronkite.html

(AC 2005) Deep Background. American Conservative. Aug. 1, 2005.

http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html

discussed in Antiwar.com [hot link to “Antiwar.com” to following URL.]

http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734

Top Bin Laden Expert: The Tapes are Fakes Kevin Barrett As a PhD in Islamic and Arabic Studies, I hate to say this, but I’ll say it anyway. The events of 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam. The war on terror itself is as phony as the latest “Bin Laden tape.” (Guardian 04) It’s tough to admit because I know on which side my bread is buttered - and dropping Islam from the 9/11 equation is like dropping my bread butter-side-down. The myth that 9/11 had something to do with has poured millions into Arabic and Islamic studies. I finished my PhD in 2005, so all I have to do is keep my eyes in my pocket and my nose to the ground, parrot the party line, and I’ll be on the fast track to tenure. The trouble is, it’s all based on a big lie. Take the recent “Bin Laden tape,” - please! That voice was no more Bin Laden than it was my late Aunt Corinne from Peoria. I recently helped translate a previously unknown Bin Laden tape, a real one from the early 90’s, back when he was still alive. I know the guy’s flowery religious rhetoric. The recent tape certainly wasn’t him. The top American Bin Laden expert agrees. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies Department, has just finished a book of translations of Bin Laden’s speeches. He says the recent tape is a fake and that Bin Laden has been dead for years. (ABC 2004). Ersatz Bin Laden tapes “verified” by the CIA are nothing new. Every Bin Laden statement since 2001 has been blatantly bogus. The last we heard from the real Bin Laden were the following words recorded by Pakistani journalists: “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation . . . I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks on the United States . . . I had no knowledge of these attacks. . .” (Wiki 2004) Then, on December 13, 2001, as George Bush was whining about the “outrageous conspiracy theories” that were spreading like wildfire, the first and shoddiest of the “Bin Laden Speaks from the Grave” tapes appeared. The video’s sound and picture quality were horrible. It showed a big guy with a black beard, doing a passable imitation of Bin Laden’s voice, claiming foreknowledge, if not responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and chortling over their success. The trouble was, the big guy was clearly not Bin Laden. He was at least 40 or 50 pounds heavier and his facial features were obviously different. (911Res 2005) The “Fatty Bin Laden tape” was widely ridiculed and I have yet to meet an informed observer who considers it authentic. (If you haven’t figured this out yet, go back and look at the images from the tape and compare them to other images of Bin Laden.) But the media let the fraud pass without asking the hard questions. Why was the US government waving this blatantly fake “confession” video in our faces? Perhaps due to the widespread hilarity evoked by Fatty Bin Laden, the next Ousama-from-beyond-the-grave message had no images: It was an audio tape delivered to al-Jazeera in the fall of 2002. The CIA verified it as “authentic,” but ended up with egg on its face when the world’s leading voice identification experts at IDIAP in Switzerland reported that “the message was recorded by an impostor.” (Guardian 2002) Every Bin Laden message since then has been equally phony. They are released at moments when the Bush regime needs a boost - and the American (mainstream) media go along with the fraud. Remember the bogus Bin Laden tape that made headlines right before the 2004 elections? If you didn’t figure out that it was a CIA-produced commercial for George Bush, I have some great bridges to sell you. Walter Cronkite, bless his heart, opined that Karl Rove was behind that tape. (CNN ) But the rest of the media just kept pretending that the Emperor was clothed. And the fraud continues. Last week’s [need a date if you don’t want this article to age prematurely] Bin Laden tape has been ridiculed by America’s top Bin Laden expert, yet the US media gamely held its tattered fig leaf over the Emperor’s loins. Professor Lawrence believes that the tape was designed to distract world opinion from the horrific massacre of Pakistani civilians by an errant CIA drone. But it may have another, more sinister purpose: To prepare public opinion for another false-flag 9/11-style attack designed to trigger a US-Israel nuclear attack on Iran. (AC 2005) As our top Bin Laden expert Professor Lawrence says, the real Bin Laden, who insisted that he had nothing to do with 9/11, has been dead since 2001. The fake messages have been fabricated by al-CIA-duh to support the Bush regime and its phony “war on terror.” It is time for Americans to rise up against the masters of synthetic terror who have been looting the US taxpayer, torching the Constitution, demolishing the economy, and threatening a nuclear Armageddon. About the author Dr Barrett holds a PhD in Arabic, with a focus on Islamic studies, from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. He is cofounder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com References (Guardian 04) The Making of the Terror Myth. The Guardian, Oct 10 2004. http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html (ABC 04) A. Rupinta. Duke Professor Sceptical of Bin Laden Tape. ABC News, Jan. 19, 2006. http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?%20section=local=3828678 (Wiki 2004) Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 Attacks. Wikipedia, 2004. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11,_2001_attacks (911Res 2005) “Fatty” bin Laden. 911 Research. 2005. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html (Guardian 2002) B. Whittaker. Swiss Scientists 95% Sure that Bin Laden Recording Was a Fake. The Guardian, Jan 30, 2002. http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,851112,00.html (CNN 2004) Larry King Live. Bin Laden Releases New Videotape. CNN. Oct 24, 2004. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html Referred to in WRH. [hot link “WRH” to following URL:] http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cronkite.html (AC 2005) Deep Background. American Conservative. Aug. 1, 2005. http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html discussed in Antiwar.com [hot link to “Antiwar.com” to following URL.] http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734

© 2003-2010 S.P.I.N.E.             Login

Top Bin Laden Expert: The Tapes are Fakes Kevin Barrett As a PhD in Islamic and Arabic Studies, I hate to say this, but I’ll say it anyway. The events of 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam. The war on terror itself is as phony as the latest “Bin Laden tape.” (Guardian 04) It’s tough to admit because I know on which side my bread is buttered - and dropping Islam from the 9/11 equation is like dropping my bread butter-side-down. The myth that 9/11 had something to do with has poured millions into Arabic and Islamic studies. I finished my PhD in 2005, so all I have to do is keep my eyes in my pocket and my nose to the ground, parrot the party line, and I’ll be on the fast track to tenure. The trouble is, it’s all based on a big lie. Take the recent “Bin Laden tape,” - please! That voice was no more Bin Laden than it was my late Aunt Corinne from Peoria. I recently helped translate a previously unknown Bin Laden tape, a real one from the early 90’s, back when he was still alive. I know the guy’s flowery religious rhetoric. The recent tape certainly wasn’t him. The top American Bin Laden expert agrees. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies Department, has just finished a book of translations of Bin Laden’s speeches. He says the recent tape is a fake and that Bin Laden has been dead for years. (ABC 2004). Ersatz Bin Laden tapes “verified” by the CIA are nothing new. Every Bin Laden statement since 2001 has been blatantly bogus. The last we heard from the real Bin Laden were the following words recorded by Pakistani journalists: “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation . . . I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks on the United States . . . I had no knowledge of these attacks. . .” (Wiki 2004) Then, on December 13, 2001, as George Bush was whining about the “outrageous conspiracy theories” that were spreading like wildfire, the first and shoddiest of the “Bin Laden Speaks from the Grave” tapes appeared. The video’s sound and picture quality were horrible. It showed a big guy with a black beard, doing a passable imitation of Bin Laden’s voice, claiming foreknowledge, if not responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and chortling over their success. The trouble was, the big guy was clearly not Bin Laden. He was at least 40 or 50 pounds heavier and his facial features were obviously different. (911Res 2005) The “Fatty Bin Laden tape” was widely ridiculed and I have yet to meet an informed observer who considers it authentic. (If you haven’t figured this out yet, go back and look at the images from the tape and compare them to other images of Bin Laden.) But the media let the fraud pass without asking the hard questions. Why was the US government waving this blatantly fake “confession” video in our faces? Perhaps due to the widespread hilarity evoked by Fatty Bin Laden, the next Ousama-from-beyond-the-grave message had no images: It was an audio tape delivered to al-Jazeera in the fall of 2002. The CIA verified it as “authentic,” but ended up with egg on its face when the world’s leading voice identification experts at IDIAP in Switzerland reported that “the message was recorded by an impostor.” (Guardian 2002) Every Bin Laden message since then has been equally phony. They are released at moments when the Bush regime needs a boost - and the American (mainstream) media go along with the fraud. Remember the bogus Bin Laden tape that made headlines right before the 2004 elections? If you didn’t figure out that it was a CIA-produced commercial for George Bush, I have some great bridges to sell you. Walter Cronkite, bless his heart, opined that Karl Rove was behind that tape. (CNN ) But the rest of the media just kept pretending that the Emperor was clothed. And the fraud continues. Last week’s [need a date if you don’t want this article to age prematurely] Bin Laden tape has been ridiculed by America’s top Bin Laden expert, yet the US media gamely held its tattered fig leaf over the Emperor’s loins. Professor Lawrence believes that the tape was designed to distract world opinion from the horrific massacre of Pakistani civilians by an errant CIA drone. But it may have another, more sinister purpose: To prepare public opinion for another false-flag 9/11-style attack designed to trigger a US-Israel nuclear attack on Iran. (AC 2005) As our top Bin Laden expert Professor Lawrence says, the real Bin Laden, who insisted that he had nothing to do with 9/11, has been dead since 2001. The fake messages have been fabricated by al-CIA-duh to support the Bush regime and its phony “war on terror.” It is time for Americans to rise up against the masters of synthetic terror who have been looting the US taxpayer, torching the Constitution, demolishing the economy, and threatening a nuclear Armageddon. About the author Dr Barrett holds a PhD in Arabic, with a focus on Islamic studies, from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. He is cofounder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com References (Guardian 04) The Making of the Terror Myth. The Guardian, Oct 10 2004. http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html (ABC 04) A. Rupinta. Duke Professor Sceptical of Bin Laden Tape. ABC News, Jan. 19, 2006. http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?%20section=local=3828678 (Wiki 2004) Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 Attacks. Wikipedia, 2004. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11,_2001_attacks (911Res 2005) “Fatty” bin Laden. 911 Research. 2005. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html (Guardian 2002) B. Whittaker. Swiss Scientists 95% Sure that Bin Laden Recording Was a Fake. The Guardian, Jan 30, 2002. http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,851112,00.html (CNN 2004) Larry King Live. Bin Laden Releases New Videotape. CNN. Oct 24, 2004. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html Referred to in WRH. [hot link “WRH” to following URL:] http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cronkite.html (AC 2005) Deep Background. American Conservative. Aug. 1, 2005. http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html discussed in Antiwar.com [hot link to “Antiwar.com” to following URL.] http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734

© 2003-2010 S.P.I.N.E.             Login

Top Bin Laden Expert: The Tapes are Fakes Kevin Barrett As a PhD in Islamic and Arabic Studies, I hate to say this, but I’ll say it anyway. The events of 9/11 had nothing to do with Islam. The war on terror itself is as phony as the latest “Bin Laden tape.” (Guardian 04) It’s tough to admit because I know on which side my bread is buttered - and dropping Islam from the 9/11 equation is like dropping my bread butter-side-down. The myth that 9/11 had something to do with has poured millions into Arabic and Islamic studies. I finished my PhD in 2005, so all I have to do is keep my eyes in my pocket and my nose to the ground, parrot the party line, and I’ll be on the fast track to tenure. The trouble is, it’s all based on a big lie. Take the recent “Bin Laden tape,” - please! That voice was no more Bin Laden than it was my late Aunt Corinne from Peoria. I recently helped translate a previously unknown Bin Laden tape, a real one from the early 90’s, back when he was still alive. I know the guy’s flowery religious rhetoric. The recent tape certainly wasn’t him. The top American Bin Laden expert agrees. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies Department, has just finished a book of translations of Bin Laden’s speeches. He says the recent tape is a fake and that Bin Laden has been dead for years. (ABC 2004). Ersatz Bin Laden tapes “verified” by the CIA are nothing new. Every Bin Laden statement since 2001 has been blatantly bogus. The last we heard from the real Bin Laden were the following words recorded by Pakistani journalists: “I stress that I have not carried out this act, which appears to have been carried out by individuals with their own motivation . . . I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks on the United States . . . I had no knowledge of these attacks. . .” (Wiki 2004) Then, on December 13, 2001, as George Bush was whining about the “outrageous conspiracy theories” that were spreading like wildfire, the first and shoddiest of the “Bin Laden Speaks from the Grave” tapes appeared. The video’s sound and picture quality were horrible. It showed a big guy with a black beard, doing a passable imitation of Bin Laden’s voice, claiming foreknowledge, if not responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and chortling over their success. The trouble was, the big guy was clearly not Bin Laden. He was at least 40 or 50 pounds heavier and his facial features were obviously different. (911Res 2005) The “Fatty Bin Laden tape” was widely ridiculed and I have yet to meet an informed observer who considers it authentic. (If you haven’t figured this out yet, go back and look at the images from the tape and compare them to other images of Bin Laden.) But the media let the fraud pass without asking the hard questions. Why was the US government waving this blatantly fake “confession” video in our faces? Perhaps due to the widespread hilarity evoked by Fatty Bin Laden, the next Ousama-from-beyond-the-grave message had no images: It was an audio tape delivered to al-Jazeera in the fall of 2002. The CIA verified it as “authentic,” but ended up with egg on its face when the world’s leading voice identification experts at IDIAP in Switzerland reported that “the message was recorded by an impostor.” (Guardian 2002) Every Bin Laden message since then has been equally phony. They are released at moments when the Bush regime needs a boost - and the American (mainstream) media go along with the fraud. Remember the bogus Bin Laden tape that made headlines right before the 2004 elections? If you didn’t figure out that it was a CIA-produced commercial for George Bush, I have some great bridges to sell you. Walter Cronkite, bless his heart, opined that Karl Rove was behind that tape. (CNN ) But the rest of the media just kept pretending that the Emperor was clothed. And the fraud continues. Last week’s [need a date if you don’t want this article to age prematurely] Bin Laden tape has been ridiculed by America’s top Bin Laden expert, yet the US media gamely held its tattered fig leaf over the Emperor’s loins. Professor Lawrence believes that the tape was designed to distract world opinion from the horrific massacre of Pakistani civilians by an errant CIA drone. But it may have another, more sinister purpose: To prepare public opinion for another false-flag 9/11-style attack designed to trigger a US-Israel nuclear attack on Iran. (AC 2005) As our top Bin Laden expert Professor Lawrence says, the real Bin Laden, who insisted that he had nothing to do with 9/11, has been dead since 2001. The fake messages have been fabricated by al-CIA-duh to support the Bush regime and its phony “war on terror.” It is time for Americans to rise up against the masters of synthetic terror who have been looting the US taxpayer, torching the Constitution, demolishing the economy, and threatening a nuclear Armageddon. About the author Dr Barrett holds a PhD in Arabic, with a focus on Islamic studies, from the University of Wisconsin at Madison. He is cofounder of the Muslim-Christian-Jewish Alliance for 9/11 Truth: http://mujca.com References (Guardian 04) The Making of the Terror Myth. The Guardian, Oct 10 2004. http://www.guardian.co.uk/terrorism/story/0,12780,1327904,00.html (ABC 04) A. Rupinta. Duke Professor Sceptical of Bin Laden Tape. ABC News, Jan. 19, 2006. http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?%20section=local=3828678 (Wiki 2004) Responsibility for the September 11, 2001 Attacks. Wikipedia, 2004. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility_for_the_September_11,_2001_attacks (911Res 2005) “Fatty” bin Laden. 911 Research. 2005. http://911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/binladinvideo.html (Guardian 2002) B. Whittaker. Swiss Scientists 95% Sure that Bin Laden Recording Was a Fake. The Guardian, Jan 30, 2002. http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,851112,00.html (CNN 2004) Larry King Live. Bin Laden Releases New Videotape. CNN. Oct 24, 2004. http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0410/29/lkl.01.html Referred to in WRH. [hot link “WRH” to following URL:] http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cronkite.html (AC 2005) Deep Background. American Conservative. Aug. 1, 2005. http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html discussed in Antiwar.com [hot link to “Antiwar.com” to following URL.] http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=6734

© 2003-2010 S.P.I.N.E.             Login

v

[Sigurður Sigurðsson, 2.10.2010 kl. 13:56]

Já sæll. magus setur hér inn svakalegan langhund sem ég nenni ekki að lesa. En eflaust er eitthvað til í öllum þessum samsæriskenningum en mér er eiginlega bara nákvæmlega sama. Ég hef bara nóg með að komast í gegnum þennan táradal sem íslenskt þjóðfélag er að breytast í.